MetaCore Security · Cybersecurity Operating Layer

Security starts with boundaries.Then comes automation.

MetaCore Security combines Cyber Core, a persistent Security Persona, asset and incident context, authority boundaries, verification and audit evidence around bounded security workflows.

Choose a security workflowOpen Security module →Request a security pilot
Security boundary. MetaCore does not promise to monitor everything by default and does not replace SOC operations, NIS2 responsibilities, system administration or incident command. Security actions require authorized scope, appropriate access and human-defined authority. NIS2 readiness or a control map is not NIS2 certification, a legal compliance opinion or a substitute for SOC operations.
An operator works at the desk while a MetaCore Security Persona holds a bounded protection picture over home, business assets and infrastructure.
Cybersecurity operating layerHumans set the boundary. The Security Persona holds the picture.

Cyber Core + Security Persona + evidence discipline. The model can change. Security context, authority, incident state, verification and evidence remain structured around the mission.

  • Authorized scope
  • Security Persona
  • Audit evidence
Cybersecurity use cases

Start from one bounded security workflow.

These six paths come directly from the MetaCore Mission Router. Each starts with explicit ownership, authorized scope and evidence requirements.

OPERATIONS

Security operations

Coordinate one recurring security operations workflow with ownership, Cyber Core and audit evidence.

Pilot: one bounded operations workflow
INCIDENT

Incident response

Structure one incident class from intake through context, response steps, evidence and closure criteria.

Pilot: one incident class
AUDIT

Security audit

Run one scoped audit domain with findings, evidence, review and a human-approved remediation plan.

Pilot: one audit domain
VULNERABILITY

Vulnerability workflow

Track one vulnerability class through intake, prioritization, remediation evidence and retest.

Pilot: one vulnerability class
REPORTING

Evidence / reporting

Assemble one report from traceable findings, source provenance and verified evidence.

Pilot: one security report
AI GOVERNANCE

AI security governance

Define one AI-assisted security workflow with an authority envelope, approval gates and evidence.

Pilot: one AI-assisted workflow
How it works

Intent → scope → context → action → verification → evidence.

Security automation should make authority and proof clearer, not create a larger invisible blast radius.

Security Intent+Authorized Scope+Cyber Core+Security Persona+Verification+Audit Evidence=MetaCore Security Operating Layer
01ScopeDefine assets, ownership, mandate and what is explicitly out of scope.
02ContextGather the relevant system, event, finding or incident context.
03AssessDiagnose or prioritize within the approved task and evidence base.
04CoordinateRecommend or execute only within the defined authority envelope.
05VerifyRetest, compare state and verify whether the intended result occurred.
06RecordLeave evidence, decisions, unresolved risk and continuity for the next cycle.
In practice

Talk to the AI operator. It works within the authority you grant.

The panel shows incident timelines, analysis and recommendations. Once approved resources are connected, the operator can move from advice to bounded action.

User and panelAI operatorApproved bridgesVerification and evidence
Resources connected by scope:MCP / APISSHFTPSmart home
01

Audit

Analyze signals and incidents, explain risks and recommend next steps. No changes to external systems.

Visibility and recommendations
02

Audit and remediate

With specific access, carry out agreed remediation and maintenance, verify the result and leave an action trail.

Bounded execution and care
03

Audit, remediate and modernize

Propose an upgrade plan, implement approved changes in stages, compare before and after, and prepare rollback.

Planned change and human approval
Additional orchestrated workspace — Business Codex 50

If you already have the Codex 50 GB package, the security operator can work in its isolated tenant with code, documents, data and permitted execution tools. This is an additional workspace layer, not automatic access to all infrastructure.

Explore Codex 50 →

MCP, SSH, FTP and smart-home connections are enabled only where deployed, authorized and in scope. People approve consequential or irreversible actions.

Capability stack

What is actually underneath.

Tool access is not decision authority. A security token, agent or connector does not silently become an administrator.

DOMAIN

Cyber Core

Security workflow grounding, controls vocabulary, verification logic and operating methods.

PERSONA

Security Persona

Persistent operating role for diagnosis, coordination, verification and documentation. Not a claim of autonomous security authority.

CONTEXT

Asset / incident context

Relevant systems, findings, sessions, events, ownership, changes and unresolved security state.

AUTHORITY

Authority envelope

Explicit scope, least authority, approval gates and separation between visibility, recommendation and action.

VERIFICATION

Retest & state comparison

PLAN is not DONE. A remediation or response step requires evidence that the resulting state changed as intended.

EVIDENCE

Audit evidence

Trace findings, sources, decisions, actions and verification into a reviewable operational record.

TRUST

Trust & governance

Security, privacy, responsible AI, incident reporting and organizational governance remain explicit layers.

INVARIANT

The intelligence can change.

The operating system remains: context, authority, evidence, continuity and rollback discipline.

Where security work happens

Platform controls and live incident response, each in its own lane.

Use the platform module for access and AI action controls. Use the live response lane to build an incident record.

Existing module

MetaCore Security

The live Security module documents identity/session controls, bridge and entitlements, Scoped Authority, workspace recovery, AI/tool boundaries, incident evidence and security assurance claims.

Open Security module →
Live response lane

Kiberapsauga LIVE

An existing incident / cybersecurity response surface remains available as its own lane rather than being collapsed into the MetaCore vertical.

Open response lane →
Proof & existing surfaces

Deep controls already exist. This vertical organizes the path into them.

The front door does not duplicate the existing security surfaces. It routes the right mission into the right operating layer.

Kiberapsauga 5-phase operating model — proof and existing security surfaces in one view.
Evidence & governance

Trust + DELTA

Trust Center exposes policy and governance boundaries. DELTA provides a disciplined before/after frame for security workflow changes.

Trust Center →DELTA →
Product path

Use the operating level the security workflow actually needs.

Cybersecurity is a domain capability across the MetaCore product ladder. Infrastructure scale and organizational deployment remain separate decisions.

01 · USE

MetaCore User

Account & services

Use eligible security services and account functions without a workspace subscription.

→
02 · CONTINUE

MetaCloud 1GB

Personal AI Workspace

Persistent security context, files, evidence outputs and Persona continuity.

→
03 · EXECUTE

Business Codex 50

Professional execution workspace

For code, integrations, server-backed workflows and bounded infrastructure execution.

→
04 · EXPAND

Enterprise Quantum 150GB

On request

Higher-capacity enterprise execution where real data and operational scope justify it.

→
05 · TRANSFORM

Individual Enterprise

Corporate & Team

Workshop + Operator + security roles, integrations, governance, controls and organizational architecture.

Products & pricing →Business deployment →
One measurable security pilot

Pick one workflow. Define the scope and evidence before connecting automation.

A strong first pilot is deliberately bounded: one incident class, one audit domain, one vulnerability class, one recurring security operation or one AI governance workflow. Start with ownership, baseline and allowed authority.

TimeDetection-to-triage, analysis, handoff or closure time.
EvidenceCompleteness and traceability of findings, actions and verification.
ControlAuthority scope, approval gates and absence of silent privilege expansion.
OutcomeVerified remediation, closure criteria, residual risk and repeatability.
Request a Security pilot →Review Security controls →
AI Security Persona — agents, Personas and operator coordination in the security operating layer.

MetaCore Platform gives agents a coordinating system for action.

AI Persona is an operational assistant that monitors and responds. For Security, that means bounded tools around verified context, least authority, human approval, evidence, rollback and continuity.

Discuss Security →Back to Mission Router
KIBERAPSAUGA LIVE

Open the live incident response laneIncident protocols · logs · human control

Kiberapsauga LIVE is the operational incident-response surface: register an incident, attach logs and evidence, get structured analysis, and keep critical decisions with a human operator. It remains its own lane — not a substitute for SOC command or MetaCore Security as a whole.

Open live.kiberapsauga.lt → Kiberapsauga LIVE
Business inquiry

Form a security request for your company.

Describe one bounded security workflow, ownership and evidence needs. The MetaCore deployment team will review the scope and return with the most appropriate pilot or deployment path.

✦ Security · business client questionnaire

Tell us the company context and 1–2 security workflows.

For security pilots, Corporate & Team deployment and custom enterprise scope. Private MetaCloud users do not need this form for personal workspace only.

01 InterestPilot / deployment / live response lane
02 WorkflowDescribe 1–2 bounded security processes
03 Scope + evidenceAuthority, baseline and DELTA criteria
Selected path

I don't know exactly — please recommend a security path

You can change the package below. Critical security actions always stay under human authority.

Secure request · reviewed by the MetaCore security deployment team
What to describe
Give us the operating picture
  • 1–2 real security workflows
  • Assets / systems / ownership
  • Current tools and authority gates
  • Evidence you want before/after
What happens next
From inquiry to pilot
  • We review interest and workflow
  • Confirm scope and authority envelope
  • Send a bounded pilot / deployment proposal
  • Onboarding starts after approval
Need live incident help now?
Use the response lane

live.kiberapsauga.lt is for active incident protocols. This form is for company deployment and pilot scoping.