For a person or a business, she helps gather facts, documents and deadlines, surface risks, prepare questions, response or negotiation options, and hand a complex situation to a specialist in an organised form.
Not an all-knowing guardian or an automatic decision-maker. TEISĖTA prepares the material; a person makes the decision.
The starting point is the same: a concrete event, facts and documents. The system then adapts the work to a personal or business situation.
When you receive a letter, demand, fine or contract — or simply do not know where to begin.
When daily decisions touch contracts, suppliers, customers, employees, debt or internal procedures.
AI helps manage the material. A person makes the decision.
These six paths come directly from the MetaCore Mission Router. Each can begin as one bounded pilot with clear sources, questions, approvals and evidence.
Review one contract class against defined questions, terms, risks and source material.
Pilot: one contract class + human approvalInvestigate one bounded legal question with source provenance, citations and a human-reviewed conclusion.
Pilot: one research questionPrepare a recurring legal document type from verified inputs and structured document context.
Pilot: one recurring document typeStructure facts, positions, evidence and next actions around a case without losing the human decision role.
Pilot: one case workflowBuild an evidence workspace with provenance, status, unresolved questions and review checkpoints.
Pilot: one evidence setMap one recurring internal legal process with company context, approvals, work discipline and measurable cycle time.
Pilot: one internal legal processThe system is designed to make scope and authority clearer, not to hide legal judgment behind automation.
Model ≠ Persona ≠ legal authority. MetaCore keeps those layers separate and explicit.
Domain grounding, legal workflow structure and source-aware operating methods.
Persistent operating role, mission context, task mode and continuity. Not a claim of independent professional authority.
Facts, positions, contracts, prior decisions, unresolved questions and matter-specific state.
Keep the path from source to assertion, draft, review and outcome visible enough to verify.
Approval gates distinguish access to context from authority to make or execute material decisions.
Repeatable drafting, comparison, evidence organization, handoff and review workflows.
Privacy, security, auditability and organization-specific governance around legal AI use.
The operating system remains: context, authority, evidence, continuity and review discipline.
LAW CORE takes a concrete question, separates facts from assumptions, selects the legal domain and workflow, and keeps the result reviewable. The access method never changes the legal-authority boundary.
Structured tools and explicit actions. The assistant receives only the granted context and permitted operation.
One authenticated request is bound to one user and one event. Cross-user or cross-event access fails closed.
Separately provisioned technical access for deployment, logs, audits and rollback. It is not a client case interface and grants no legal authority.
Every matter moves through seven traceable layers. Links reveal adjacent legal domains without turning similarity into a legal conclusion.
The 906 entries are reported across 28 branches; the insolvency branch does not report a rule count. These figures describe internal work structures, not a count of currently valid legal provisions or automatic legal conclusions.
29 active modules do not mean 29 automatic legal answers. 19 planned domains provide no active rules, and open gaps are tracked in internal LAW CORE materials. The default mode is READ ONLY, external actions are off, and material output requires human approval. Official sources control.
TEISĖTA brings relevant law, decisions and your case material into one reviewable workflow. These are the types of information and the actual limits on access.
AI Persona TEISĖTA works with MetaCore LAW CORE to connect your facts and evidence, the law applicable on the relevant date, the reasoning in court decisions and possible courses of action. When a matter spans several legal fields, the system helps reveal how they relate.
This helps distil the essential issue from layered material, spot gaps and prepare practical options. Material conclusions are checked against full accessible sources; a person approves the decision.
Open your matter
These measure different routes and selections; their sum is not the total number of Lithuanian acts or cases.
We can obtain act identifiers, dates, consolidated editions and annexes. The applicable text is checked against the official source.
We can search publicly released, anonymised Lithuanian court decisions. Our internal work includes 49 checked precedent entries.
Your facts, letters and documents become a clear package for a decision and a handoff to a professional.
Institutional decisions, guidance and Seimas committee material can inform the context of a rule. Automated reading depends on session access.
Notices, contracts and supporting documents may show parties, deadlines and procedural steps when the partner route is available.
Company registry records and declarations of interests help check an entity and its connections when access is granted.
Access check · 2026-09-23: public legal data and public court search are available. Institution, procurement and registry collections require active access; automated reading is not confirmed for this session.
MetaCore Legal is a new vertical surface. We do not claim a legal outcome that has not been measured. Existing ecosystem components are exposed separately and explicitly.
A live structured mediation and case-context surface already exists inside the ecosystem. It remains its own module rather than being presented as the whole Legal product.
For automation or legal operations change, define the baseline, review questions and evidence requirements first. Compare the bounded workflow before expanding the scope.
Legal is a domain capability across the MetaCore product ladder; it is not a separate foundation model subscription.
Use eligible legal services and account functions without a workspace subscription.
Persistent legal context, files, outputs and Persona continuity.
For larger document, code, integration and server-backed legal operations.
Higher-capacity enterprise execution when the real workload and data scope require it.
Workshop + Operator + custom roles, legal operations, integrations, governance and team architecture.
A good first pilot is intentionally narrow: one contract class, one recurring document, one evidence set, one mediation workflow or one internal legal operation. The pilot should have known inputs, explicit review authority and measurable before/after criteria.
AI Persona is an operational assistant that monitors and responds. For Legal, that means a persistent operating role around verified context, human authority, source provenance, evidence and continuity.
Mediatorius.AI is TEISĖTA's live workspace: events, documents, positions, deadlines, analysis and next steps stay together. When needed, the prepared material is handed to a human specialist.
